Section Methodology Track record
Aavistus Country Posture

Are younger generations poorer than their parents were at the same age?

Every quarter we score G7-plus countries — plus East Asian leading-indicator cases — on eight structural pillars and three cross-cutting dimensions. The Lifetime Cohort Wealth Ratio is the centrepiece. Free, no registration, calibrated against falsifiable predictions we publish in advance.

Phase 1 · Reference implementations: Finland · United Kingdom
Open for all. No registration. No paywall on the methodology, the prediction log, or the country charts. The credibility comes from being audited in public.

The headline chart

Across most developed economies, the cohort born in 1985 has accumulated meaningfully less real net wealth at age 35 than the cohort born in 1955 had at the same age. The gap ranges from roughly 15% in Germany to over 50% in Japan.

Lifetime Cohort Wealth Ratio cross-country comparison

Read the methodology and bias audit before drawing conclusions from the headline. The directional claim — younger cohorts hold less wealth at the same age — is robust to every audit we can run. The magnitude of the gap is uncertain in either direction and the methodology page documents which direction each known bias pushes.

Briefs

Briefs · in audit

The first country brief is currently being re-verified value-by-value against IMF WEO Oct 2025 and the cohort-wealth sources. It returns when every numerical claim is defensible — not before.

Audit in progress · 2026-05-03

Cultural signals — the leading-indicator companion

The Future Confidence dimension tracks an expanding catalogue of cultural vocabulary — hygge, tang ping, sōshoku-danshi, sampo, soft life, niksen, kotoilu, kalsarikännit and others — that legitimates reduced engagement with the work-strive-accumulate sequence. These terms are not synonyms: each carries its own cultural meaning, severity, and history. What's analytically interesting is that the catalogue itself is expanding, on a schedule that lines up with measurable structural pressure on the cohorts using it. Read the dedicated page: A growing vocabulary for reduced engagement.

Why we publish this

Most country analysis is either deferential (IMF, OECD), short-term and narrative-led (bank macro research), or ideologically pre-positioned (think tanks). Aavistus Country Posture sits parallel: primary-source-grounded, calibrated, ideologically cross-cutting, leading-indicator-aware. Every brief logs falsifiable predictions; every prediction is audited at 12 and 24 months on the public Track Record page.

What's coming

Phase 2 (months 2-8) adds Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Sweden, Netherlands plus Japan, Korea, Taiwan as leading-indicator benchmark cases. Phase 2 also delivers the comparative dashboard, the Narrative-Gap quarterly publication, and the first calibration retrospective.